Home › Journal › Factory audit checklist
Crochet Factory Audit Checklist: 12 Checks Before You Pay
A crochet factory audit is a structured check that the company invoicing you also owns the workshop, the yarn stock and the workforce behind your order — verified through documents, records and a walk-through rather than through a catalogue.
1. Entity and paper trail
Most sourcing failures on handcrafted goods begin before a single stitch is made: the buyer audits a polished trading office while the goods come from an unrelated workshop. Start with the legal layer, then work downwards.
Business licence and the company behind the invoice
Ask for the business licence of the entity that issues the commercial invoice and match its unified social credit code against the company name on the quotation, the bank account and the export declaration. Three different names with no documented relationship is the single most common structural problem in this category.
Production entity disclosed in writing
Group structures are normal. What matters is that the relationship is stated: which company owns the knitting workshop, which one holds the yarn inventory, and which one employs or contracts the artisans. Our own structure is published for exactly this reason: brand WOOLORA, legal entity Yiwu Kiva Stitch Co., Ltd., group Qinhuangdao Jiwa Supply Chain Management Co., Ltd., and production entity Yiwu Xiaoman Knitting Co., Ltd.
Third-party audit reference
A named audit is worth more than a wall of certificates, because it can be checked. Ask for the report number and the auditing body, then confirm the scope covers the site you are buying from. TÜV Rheinland references 481118286_T and 482384640_P+T are the ones we hand to buyers at quotation stage.
2. Material and process
Yarn traceability
For toys, the yarn decides most of the compliance outcome. Ask which mill supplies the yarn, whether the fibre is OEKO-TEX Standard 100 certified at yarn level, and how dye lots are recorded between the sample and the bulk run. A factory that cannot trace yarn back to a lot number cannot promise shade consistency on a reorder, and shade drift is the most frequent cause of rejected repeat orders.
QC gates on the line, not at the door
Inspection only at packing tells you what already went wrong. A working quality system has gates: yarn incoming check, first-piece approval against the technical blueprint, in-process checks at agreed intervals, and a final gate with pull-force sampling. Ask to see the actual check sheets for the last month, signed and dated per batch, and compare the handwriting.
Component safety testing
Safety eyes, noses, pom-poms, ribbon and any attached part are where recalls come from. The test is mechanical: a pull-force gauge applied to each component on production units, with the result logged against the batch. Testing at 90N gives margin above the EN71 requirement, which is useful when a component supplier changes without notice.
3. Capacity and people
Does the claimed capacity exist physically?
A distributed artisan network and a single factory hall are different operating models, and each has to be verified differently. For distributed work, ask for base-level counts, the transport and consolidation route into the warehouse, and a schedule that shows where your order sits. For a single hall, count the machines and the people mid-shift, and check that in-process goods match the schedule on the wall.
Who actually crochets
Ask how many people work on your design type, whether they are employees or contracted artisans, and who trains new ones. On handcrafted goods the answer changes your lead time more than any machine list, because a new design has to be learned by every hand that will work on it.
Warehouse, inspection and packing under one roof
Consolidation is where mixed-carton orders either succeed or turn into a puzzle of split shipments. A 1,775 m² inspection and packing centre with a fixed weekly handover day is a scheduling asset: it tells you which day goods leave, which is the number your forwarder actually needs.
The 12-point checklist
| # | Check | Evidence to request | Fail condition |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Legal entity matches invoice | Business licence + credit code | Name on invoice differs with no documented link |
| 2 | Production entity disclosed | Written org statement | "We have many factories" with no names |
| 3 | Audit reference verifiable | Report number + body | Certificate images without a report number |
| 4 | Yarn traceability | Mill name + lot records | No lot discipline between sample and bulk |
| 5 | Yarn safety certification | OEKO-TEX Standard 100 at yarn level | Claim covers finished toy only |
| 6 | Incoming yarn inspection | Check sheets, dated | No incoming gate at all |
| 7 | First-piece approval | Signed first article vs blueprint | Production starts before approval |
| 8 | In-process QC | Interval records per batch | Only final inspection exists |
| 9 | Pull-force testing | Gauge log per production run | Tested on sample only |
| 10 | Capacity proof | Yarn purchase + production schedule | Capacity shown as a slide figure |
| 11 | Workforce reality | Live walk-through, mid-shift | Empty benches, no in-process goods |
| 12 | Packing and handover | Consolidation area + fixed handover day | No stated dispatch rhythm |
Red flags that end an audit early
- Address mismatch. The licence address is an office floor while the "factory" is described only in photographs.
- Undisclosed subcontracting. Hand work is passed to households with no record of who made what, which breaks both traceability and any social-compliance claim.
- Back-filled records. A month of QC sheets in one pen, one handwriting, no corrections — real production records are messy.
- Reused sampling photos. The same piece appears in three unrelated design enquiries, or the photo lighting changes mid-set.
- Test report without scope. A certificate exists but does not name the product, the fibre or the age grade you are buying.
An audit is a filter, not a guarantee. Its value is that it converts claims into documents you can check again next season — and that is what makes a second order cheaper than the first.
Frequently asked questions
What should a crochet factory audit verify first?
The legal entity and the production entity, because they are often two different companies. Confirm the unified social credit code of the trading company you are invoiced by, then ask which registered company actually owns the workshop, the yarn stock and the workforce. A supplier that cannot name both, with documents, is a trading intermediary rather than a factory.
Do I need to visit China to audit a crochet supplier?
Not necessarily, but a remote audit needs harder evidence than a visit: a live video walk-through on a scheduled day, the audit report reference from a third party such as TÜV Rheinland, and shipping documents that show goods leaving the stated address. A site visit is still the only way to see whether the workforce in the room matches the capacity claimed.
Which certifications are worth checking on paper?
EN71-1/2/3 for the European Union, ASTM F963 for the United States, CE and UKCA marking where the product class requires it, and OEKO-TEX Standard 100 for the yarn itself rather than the finished toy. Read the report scope: a certificate issued for one SKU does not cover a design with different fittings, fibre content or age grading.
What is a pull-force test and why does the number matter?
It measures the force needed to detach a small component such as an eye or a limb, which is the main choking risk in soft toys. EN71 requires components to stay attached under the standard force; a factory that tests to a higher threshold, such as 90N, is sampling safety margin on every production run rather than only on the sample sent for certification.
How do I verify claimed capacity before placing a first order?
Ask for three independent proofs: a current yarn purchase record from a named mill, a production schedule showing your order slot, and a walk-through of the space where work is actually distributed. Capacity that only exists on a slide usually fails the third test, because there is no bench, no yarn stock and no in-process goods to see.
What are the warning signs that end an audit early?
Four recur: the address on the business licence does not match the workshop, subcontracted hand work is undisclosed, QC records are back-filled in one handwriting and one ink, and sampling photos are reused across unrelated designs. Any one of these means the rest of the paperwork cannot be trusted either.
Audit documents, not promises.
Related pages: TÜV audit and 90N pull-force QC, seven checkpoints for choosing a manufacturer, and the manufacturer FAQ on MOQ and lead time.
Email bianhaitao@kivastitch.com · WhatsApp +86 186 3356 8777 · Alibaba haitao1688.en.alibaba.com